Skip to main content

Promoting progressive AMHP anti-racist practice

Posted by: , , and , Posted on: - Categories: Care and support, Co-production, Mental health, Safeguarding

Lyn Romeo: It's an honour to host blogs from social workers, researchers and people with lived experience of health and social care. This post addresses core challenges for Approved Mental Health Professionals (AMHPs) and others involved in anti-racist mental health practice.

Dr Caroline Leah: Since the Mental Health Act came into force, rates of compulsory detention in mental health hospitals have more than doubled. The NIHR funded project, ImprovE-ACT, is new research aiming to reduce compulsory admissions for Black African and Caribbean (BAC) men with mental health conditions. It also aims to improve experiences of pathways to detention and the system overall.

An essential aspect of the project is the meaningful involvement of people with lived experience of MHA detention. This enables us to deeply connect and build relationships with the very people who matter.

In this blog, Debbie Best and Kenny Thompson, invite practitioners to reflect upon and challenge anti-racist practice and examine how these impact on supporting people with lived experiences of MHA detention.

"I welcome the Patient Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF) and I’m looking forward to leading on it within my local trust." [Image created by]

Let's work this out together

Debbie Best:  I’m an optimist. It’s important I present my authentic self to effect change rather than working from a position of blame, which only reinforces hostile work environments. We’re all human, it’s OK to be scared and to give yourself permission to be vulnerable.

I am also a carer. I have supported my son through local, medium, high and low secure forensic services for over fourteen years. It’s been a journey. There have, without a doubt, been some examples of good practice. However, the hardest part has been challenging practices (inequalities, disparities, gaslighting and coercion to name a few) within services.

I was the first carer to attend a safeguarding meeting in a long established hospital. So, I welcome the Patient Carer Race Equality Framework (PCREF) and I’m looking forward to leading on it within my local trust, so that together, we can affect positive change and better outcomes.

However, I do wonder if it’s going to be another tick box exercise. For example, during a BAME carers meeting (I don’t even like the term BAME), a trainer gave a brief overview of PCREF. It was going well. They explained all staff would be given cultural, statutory and regulatory awareness training.

‘That’s great’, I replied. ‘However, I also feel patients and carers should have the same training’. They responded by saying it was a great idea, which they would take back to their organisation to consider. This seemed fair enough, as they were not in a position to make any decisions there and then.

I explained that training needed to be delivered to patients, carers and professionals collectively. The representative responded with the counter view that professionals should have separate training specific to them.

I don’t agree, as it appears to be a power dynamic, coming from a place of privilege. What I’m curious about is whether the trainer’s response was conscious or unconscious.

I was left feeling this was a prime example of my lived experience of power and control. They were describing the framework from their professional perspective and trying to tell us, the patient and carer, how we should use it. That’s not equity, co-production, or partnership working. My request is simple: we must work it out together, sharing learning and understanding.

Mental health discussion group
"Medication isn’t always the answer, communication and talking therapies are important." [Image created by]

Respect our lived experience

Kenny Thompson: Having been in the mental health system and now medication free, I see that practice ideas and the medical model is out-dated and broken. How can we ‘fix’ people in a broken system, one which suffers from institutional racism? We need to consider conscious and unconscious bias in professionals, challenging racism in practice. For practice to be truly progressive and based on human rights, this includes reporting and logging incidents of racism.

I was told I would be on medication for life, but I am not and won't be. Medication isn’t always the answer, communication and talking therapies are important. However, communication with people outside your own race can be difficult.

Each case is different and seeing each person as an individual is important. We are constantly evolving. It’s essential to ask someone in crisis about their lived experiences. Having a mental health issue is a journey in a difficult and racist world. If external factors make the person sick, then racism can seem like an illness and have lasting effects. The culture around mental health must change for us all to be well.

Sharing and comments

Share this page

1 comment

  1. Comment by Nick Thompson posted on

    As the father of Kenny Thompson one of your contributors I speak from personal experience of what Kenny has been through. I am not black so can only guess what Kenny went through and may still, what has been clear has been the inability of the professionals involved to engage with Kenny and help him understand what they think he needs. Have they helped or hindered him in trying to sort out his dreadful experiences over the last 8 years? I fear I am not convinced


Leave a comment

We only ask for your email address so we know you're a real person

By submitting a comment you understand it may be published on this public website. Please read our privacy notice to see how the GOV.UK blogging platform handles your information.