This week sees the launch of the final publications of the Named Social Worker programme, launched by the Department of Health and Social Care two years ago and involving nine local authorities from across England over its two phases.
Next week, on 31 July at 12.30pm we’ll be holding a webinar to share what we’ve learned through the programme and to explore what it means for other local areas looking to take on similar approaches. I’d really encourage you to join us.
It had done this by designating a social worker to be their key point of contact. Professionally, it has helped to build social workers' skills and confidence to serve people in the most holistic, tailored and helpful way possible.
We did not prescribe a set model, instead, we invited sites to shape their approaches building on local practice, initiatives and challenges.
The difference it made
Whilst it takes time before shifts in practice bear fruit in the longer term, the evaluation found that people felt more supported and involved in shaping their plans and support for the future.
In a number of examples, and in very short periods of time, this has led to positive outcomes such as more rapid discharges from institutional settings and placements, and arrangements being sustained where they were previously breaking down.
Moreover, social workers expressed high levels of satisfaction, reporting that they are happier with the way they work with people. They also feel that their role and credibility as social work professionals is better recognised by colleagues in other services.
These social workers are raising the ambition for ‘good social work’ and helping to increase its profile, both with people who use services and with other professionals.
Finally, we are starting to see an economic case building that tells us that creating conditions for meaningful relationships, earlier on, can be a wise system-wide investment and not an unaffordable luxury.
What we learned
At the practice level there are many transferable lessons emerging from the sites, which I sincerely hope will support and enhance practice across the country. For example, we learned the:
- importance of creating spaces dedicated to reflection and learning for named social workers, in supervision and peer groups;
- power of engaging people who use services and the people around them in conversations that start from their own perspective, objectives and capabilities
- empowering effect of giving social workers the time to get to know people and use their judgement in how they work with them to achieve their goals;
- importance of communication and collaboration with colleagues in other services, and social workers' roles as advocates for the people they support.
At a policy level too, there are a number of lessons from the NSW programme that are highly relevant to other crucial integrated care questions. For example, how are we going to work collaboratively to ensure that transitions into adulthood for young people with learning disabilities are as seamless and empowering as possible?
I believe that social workers and good social work practice have a fundamental role to play in putting person-centred care at the very heart of these important initiatives. We do this by modelling and championing social work in multidisciplinary professional contexts.
This is my ambition. I hope that the lessons from the NSW programme will resonate with our many resilient, passionate and creative social workers, service and system leaders as they take on our public services many challenges.